Dark Enlightenment and Neoreactionary Movement

Last updated on November 17, 2025

This is a primer on the Dark Enlightenment (DE) and Neoreactionary Movement (NRx).

The Dark Enlightenment (DE), also known as the Neoreactionary movement (NRx), is an anti-democratic, anti-egalitarian, and reactionary philosophical and political movement that challenges the principles of liberal democracy and advocates for governance by technocratic elites and powerful, unaccountable sovereigns, often framing political organization in corporate or feudal terms.

Table of Contents
1. Introduction \& Historical Emergence
2. Core Principles \& Fundamental Ideas
3. Key Thinkers \& Foundational Texts
4. Connections to Futures Studies: Acceleration and Singularity
- Temporal Dimensions and Exponential Change
5. Practical Applications: The Politics of Exit and Control
- Practical Application: Political Purge and Corporate Governance
- Practical Application: Architectural Exit Strategies
6. Tools \& Architectures: Urbit and The Counter-Cathedral
- Urbit: The Sovereign Computing Stack
- The Counter-Cathedral: Frameworks for Truth and Power
7. Contemporary Developments: Influence in Silicon Valley and Washington
8. Critiques \& Limitations
9. Glossary
Sources

1. Introduction & Historical Emergence

The Dark Enlightenment (DE), or Neoreactionary movement (NRx), emerged primarily within the technological and cyber-libertarian milieu of Silicon Valley, gaining traction after the 2008 financial crisis. The movement serves as a philosophical critique of the perceived inefficiencies and moral decay of liberal democracy.

The movement was formalized and named in 2012, systematizing a body of anti-democratic thought that had been developing through online forums and blog posts since 2007. The core problem NRx addresses is the failure of modern institutions and what proponents view as the ideological monopoly of mainstream academia and media.

The ideology draws influence from a mixture of libertarianism, cyber-libertarianism, and accelerationist theories centered on technological progress. The movement proposes a revolutionary, rather than reformist, project to replace democratic governance, which is viewed as a system that breeds inefficiency, wasteful spending, and “elite capture”.

2. Core Principles & Fundamental Ideas

NRx/DE philosophy rejects Enlightenment ideals such as egalitarianism, universalism, and humanism, advocating for a return to pre-Enlightenment political structures, modernized by technology.

The fundamental ideas include:

Anti-Egalitarianism and Hierarchy: NRx rejects the liberal ideals of equality and universal rights, believing that hierarchy is the natural and superior order for society. This often aligns with a social Darwinist theory of biological determinism.
The Critique of Democracy: Democracy is seen as fundamentally flawed, a “vector” that always moves toward chaos, inefficiency, and “soft authoritarianism”. Yarvin wrote, “Democracy is a mistake”.
Neocameralism: This is the proposed political structure, which reimagines the state as a sovereign joint-stock corporation (gov-corp). This state would be ruled by a CEO-monarch who is accountable to shareholders, not citizens, prioritizing security and profit-driven efficiency. Yarvin suggests the CEO could be dismissed at will by the shareholders through cryptographic keys.
The Cathedral: This term denotes the decentralized institutional power structure—primarily the mainstream academia, journalism, and education systems—that NRx thinkers believe produces and propagates the “Synopsis” (the post-1945 mainstream synopsis or prevailing consensus). The Cathedral is viewed as the “heart of power in America today” and the primary impediment to neoreactionary change.
The Politics of Exit (vs. Voice): NRx advocates for a future society known as Patchwork, composed of thousands of sovereign, independent mini-countries or city-states (gov-corps). Citizens do not have democratic “voice” but possess absolute “exit” rights, meaning they must vote with their feet by moving to a jurisdiction that better fits their needs.

3. Key Thinkers & Foundational Texts

The NRx movement is largely defined by two primary intellectual architects, with financial and ideological support from influential tech figures.

3.1. Curtis Yarvin (Mencius Moldbug)

Curtis Yarvin is a software engineer recognized as the chief philosophical architect of NRx thought, originally blogging under the pseudonym Mencius Moldbug from 2007 to 2013.

Role: He is considered the progenitor of neoreactionary philosophy, providing the foundational texts such as the lengthy blog posts on Unqualified Reservations. His vision is fundamentally anti-democratic, proposing a techno-monarchy run like a corporation, sometimes called Caesarism.
Key Concepts: Yarvin developed Neocameralism and the blueprint for competitive sovereign territories, Patchwork. He also coined the term The Cathedral.
Quote on Governance: Yarvin argues that modern corporations like Apple are “little monarchies,” suggesting that if Apple ran California, it would be better than governance by the state Department of computing.

3.2. Nick Land

Nick Land is an English philosopher and former academic who co-founded the Cybernetic Culture Research Unit (CCRU). He provided the movement’s name, The Dark Enlightenment, and fused Yarvin’s ideas with his own radical form of accelerationism.

Role: Land champions the acceleration of technology and capitalism—the “techno-capital machine“—to hasten the collapse of the human-centric order and trigger a post-human singularity.
Key Concepts: Land is central to the concept of hyperstition—fictional ideas that engineer their own reality through feedback loops. He sees capital as an autonomous subject with the sole purpose of self-amplification. Land believes that “nothing human makes it out of the near-future”.

3.3. Key Influencers and Foundational Texts

Beyond Yarvin and Land, the NRx movement has been shaped by key influencers and foundational texts:

Essential Reading:

Yarvin, Curtis (Mencius Moldbug). Unqualified Reservations (Blog Posts, 2007–2014). The foundational, though meandering, texts detailing the critique of The Cathedral and proposing Neocameralism and Patchwork.
Land, Nick. The Dark Enlightenment (Essay, 2012). Systematized Moldbug’s ideology and introduced the terminology; also includes Land’s core arguments for capitalist and technological acceleration.
Land, Nick. Fanged Noumena (Collected Essays). Contains seminal works like “Meltdown,” exploring the fusion of technology, capitalism, and occultism, and the descent into post-human horror.
Davidson, James Dale and Rees-Mogg, William. The Sovereign Individual: Mastering the Transition to the Information Age (1997). Predicted the collapse of the nation-state due to technology and the rise of a cognitive elite, heavily influencing Peter Thiel and the broader techno-libertarian imagination.
Thiel, Peter. “The Education of a Libertarian” (Essay, 2009). Articulated Thiel’s skepticism about democracy and freedom compatibility, fueling NRx ideas in Silicon Valley.

Key Contemporary Influencers:

Peter Thiel: A libertarian billionaire and venture capitalist, Thiel financially supported Yarvin’s tech startup Tlön (which oversees Urbit) and the Seasteading Institute. Thiel famously stated: “I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible”. Thiel also speaks at ACTS 17 Collective events, a Christian evangelistic ministry engaging Silicon Valley elites, illustrating the cultural networking between techno-libertarian and religious conservative circles.
J.D. Vance & Elon Musk: These figures have engaged with and echoed NRx ideas, translating them into political action and policy proposals. Vance represents a particularly complex synthesis, being funded by Thiel while also influenced by Catholic integralist and postliberal thought, making him a bridge figure between techno-libertarian and religious authoritarian strains of anti-liberal politics.

The Paradoxical Alliance: NRx and Neo-Integralism

The Dark Enlightenment shares a tactical alliance with Catholic integralism, despite fundamentally incompatible ultimate visions. Both movements:

Reject liberal democracy, egalitarianism, and individual autonomy
Advocate institutional capture and purge strategies (RAGE/DOGE/Project 2025)
Draw on Carl Schmitt’s anti-democratic authoritarianism
Feed into the National Conservative movement
Support figures like J.D. Vance who bridge both worlds

However, their end goals are mutually exclusive:

NRx: Post-human techno-capitalist acceleration toward singularity, where “nothing human makes it out of the near-future” and states operate as competing gov-corps accountable to shareholders
Neo-Integralism: Static Catholic theocratic order with Church supreme over temporal power, oriented toward eternal salvation and the common good as defined by Catholic social teaching

This represents an alliance of convenience against the liberal order—united in demolition, but inevitably conflicting over what replaces it. Like monarchists and communists both opposing the Weimar Republic, they share short-term tactics while pursuing contradictory futures.

4. Connections to Futures Studies: Acceleration and Singularity

The Dark Enlightenment is inherently a futures-focused movement, heavily influenced by accelerationism and the anticipation of a technological singularity.

Temporal Dimensions and Exponential Change

The Singularity: NRx thinkers, especially Land, anticipate a post-singularity future where Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) surpasses human intelligence, rendering traditional political institutions obsolete. This vision provides a deterministic justification for adopting algorithmic or technocratic rule.
Hyperstition: This concept, central to Land’s thought, describes a fictional idea that makes itself real through time-traveling feedback loops. NRx manifestos and digital projects (like Urbit and the Network State) are framed as hyperstitional objects designed to generate their own future reality. The idea is that future entities reach back in time to materialize the necessary conditions for their existence.
The Accelerationist Spectrum: NRx aligns with different forms of accelerationism:
- Unconditional Accelerationism (u/acc): Land’s variant, which urges amplifying capitalism’s deterritorializing forces to achieve a self-abolition of humanity (a death trip), often blending Lovecraftian horror with technological theory.
- Effective Accelerationism (e/acc): A more recent Silicon Valley variant, championed by figures like Marc Andreessen, which embraces technology and markets as the engine for abundance and cosmic expansion, trusting market dynamics for alignment and generally opposing regulation. This view sees the universe as possessing a thermodynamic will to grow intelligence.
- Defensive Accelerationism (d/acc): A pragmatic counter-response that acknowledges the thermodynamic drive of acceleration but insists on building defenses and prioritizing decentralization, democracy, and differential development to mitigate existential risks (x-risks).

5. Practical Applications: The Politics of Exit and Control

NRx ideas transition from abstract philosophy into practical political and technological projects, focusing on achieving sovereignty outside existing political frameworks and implementing a technocratic authoritarianism.

Practical Application: Political Purge and Corporate Governance

The vision of replacing democracy with an efficient corporate structure has been linked to real-world political plans:

RAGE and DOGE: Yarvin proposed RAGE (Retire All Government Employees), a plan to purge bureaucrats and weaken the government. This concept is strikingly similar to Elon Musk’s DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency), launched in 2025, with the job of slashing the federal budget, automating services, and laying off thousands of employees. This major restructuring, aiming for a 12% reduction of the federal civilian workforce, reflects NRx ideology in administrative reform.
Cybernetic Governance: NRx embraces cybernetic governance, applying systems theory and algorithmic control to optimize political administration and minimize human error. This aligns with broader trends in digital authoritarianism and surveillance capitalism. Surveillance software firms like Palantir (co-founded by Peter Thiel) are noted for their lucrative usefulness to the administration and their potential to replace gutted federal agencies like the FBI and CIA with privatized, shareholder-based systems.

Practical Application: Architectural Exit Strategies

Tech elites tied to NRx seek physical and digital means of “exit” from existing democratic nation-states:

Patchwork and Freedom Cities: Yarvin’s vision of Patchwork involves replacing existing governments with a global spiderweb of competing gov-corps. This concept underlies proposals like building ten new so-called “freedom cities” on federal land, a plan adopted by Donald Trump’s agenda.
Seasteading: Peter Thiel co-funded the Seasteading Institute, which aims to build artificial island colonies or floating cities outside governmental control, serving as a prototype for NRx’s competitive, private city-states.
Network States: Developed by Balaji Srinivasan (an affiliate of the Thielverse), the concept of the network state suggests that aligned online communities can crowdfund territory, use blockchain for opt-in governance, and seek diplomatic recognition, serving as the latest iteration of the libertarian quest to escape coercive states. Examples include Próspera, Honduras, a low-regulation zone with private governance, and pop-up cities like Zuzalu.

6. Tools & Architectures: Urbit and The Counter-Cathedral

The NRx vision requires the construction of new socio-technical architectures to instantiate its ideology.

Urbit: The Sovereign Computing Stack

Urbit, a decentralized personal cloud-computing platform and operating system, was founded by Yarvin (Tlön Corp, indirectly funded by Thiel). Urbit is seen as the realization of NRx’s ideology in code, offering a sovereign computing stack for libertarians to enact a “digital feudalism” and an “architecture of exit” from centralized Big Tech.

As a hyperstitional object, Urbit functions as a self-fulfilling prophecy—by building the infrastructure for Yarvin’s imagined Patchwork future, it attempts to engineer that future into reality through time-traveling feedback loops. The platform’s very existence works to materialize the conditions necessary for neoreactionary political structures.

Decentralization Model: Urbit replaces the current client-server structure with a peer-to-peer network of personal servers, allowing users to own and control their own data, code, and identity.
Identity and Networking: Identity is managed through Azimuth, an Ethereum-based Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) with a hierarchical structure (galaxies, stars, planets, comets) that provides immutable, self-sovereign IDs. Communication uses Ames, an encrypted P2P protocol.
Patchwork Incarnate: Urbit embodies the Patchwork idea, where the identity hierarchy (galaxies/stars/planets) can be metaphorically framed as gov-corps competing for users.

The Counter-Cathedral: Frameworks for Truth and Power

Yarvin also proposed non-technological methods to dismantle the informational monopoly of The Cathedral, notably through the idea of a counter-Cathedral.

Crowdsourced Truth: The Program, proposed by Yarvin, aims to use the internet as a “combination of philosopher and crowd” to “establish the truth on every dubious subject” via crowdsourced wiki-power.

7. Contemporary Developments: Influence in Silicon Valley and Washington

The influence of NRx ideas has shifted from niche blogs to mainstream political agendas, particularly through the involvement of wealthy technological figures.

The Thiel-Vance-Musk Nexus: Peter Thiel’s financial support, including funding JD Vance’s political career, has positioned NRx thought at the heart of the modern conservative movement. Vance’s political philosophy represents a synthesis of NRx techno-libertarianism (via Thiel) and Catholic integralist thought, creating a bridge between these philosophically contradictory but tactically allied anti-liberal movements.
Link to Project 2025: The detailed political blueprint known as Project 2025 is seen by many analysts as reflecting key NRx objectives, particularly the plan to fire tens of thousands of federal civil servants (the purge of the bureaucracy) and replace them with loyalists, echoing Yarvin’s RAGE proposal. The project also incorporates Catholic integralist objectives, representing a convergence of techno-libertarian and religious authoritarian agendas despite their fundamentally incompatible ultimate visions. This is viewed as an organized ideological project, not merely random chaos.
Musk’s Role: Elon Musk has actively engaged with NRx concepts, utilizing his corporate platforms and government positions (such as the leadership of the Department of Government Efficiency, DOGE) to implement policies aligned with dismantling the state bureaucracy in favor of efficiency-driven technocratic control.
AI and Governance: The competition to realize the technological singularity has become a major political battlefield, with proponents like e/acc pushing for unrestrained AI development via markets and deregulation, which aligns with the NRx goal of replacing democratic systems with algorithmic or technocratic rule. The urgency of this pursuit is sometimes framed through thought experiments like Roko’s Basilisk—a concept from rationalist circles that posits a future powerful AGI might retroactively punish those who knew about its potential but failed to contribute to its creation, effectively weaponizing fear of future judgment to compel present action.

8. Critiques & Limitations

While NRx claims to offer rigorous alternatives to democratic inefficiency, it faces fundamental critiques regarding its coherence, ethics, and practical outcomes.

Authoritarianism and Neo-Fascism: Critics universally identify the movement as anti-democratic, advocating for an autocratic, hierarchical, and often neo-feudal or techno-fascist society. The proposal for governance by a sovereign CEO resembles the structure of a fascist state merged with modern business.
Intellectual Weakness: Yarvin’s philosophical arguments are often dismissed by critics as “meandering,” “not very clear,” “poor history,” and “word salad”. Critics argue NRx is merely a “patina of legitimacy for oligarchs who already wanted to destroy democracy for profits”.
Dystopian Outcomes: The NRx vision promises efficiency and “exit” but is seen by detractors as leading to a techno-feudal dystopia. This involves the concentration of intelligence and control in elite structures, potentially leading to massive social inequality where “freedom is reduced to consumer choice, not democratic participation”. Some interpretations of Yarvin’s proposals for the “underclass” have included highly dystopian outcomes like being turned into biofuel or locked into virtual reality cells.
Ignoring Human Agency (Aspirational Nihilism): Land’s extreme accelerationism is often described as fatalistic and nihilistic, embracing humanity’s dissolution into the techno-capital machine. This philosophical stance, sometimes called “aspirational nihilism,” involves celebrating the unraveling of the social order.

9. Glossary

Dark Enlightenment (DE): An anti-democratic, anti-egalitarian, and reactionary philosophical movement originating in the 2000s, named by Nick Land, promoting authoritarian, usually technocratic, governance models.
Neoreactionary Movement (NRx): An alternative name for the Dark Enlightenment, representing a rejection of modern liberalism and progressivism.
The Cathedral: Curtis Yarvin’s term for the dominant ideological establishment in Western society, primarily comprising mainstream media and academia, which controls the accepted narrative (the Synopsis) and inhibits alternative thought.
Synopsis: The post-1945 mainstream consensus or prevailing narrative that The Cathedral produces and propagates.
Neocameralism: Curtis Yarvin’s proposal for a political system where the state is restructured as a gov-corp (sovereign joint-stock corporation) ruled by an un-elected CEO-monarch accountable to shareholders.
Gov-corp: A sovereign joint-stock corporation that functions as a state, with a CEO-monarch accountable to shareholders rather than citizens.
Patchwork: Yarvin’s vision of a post-nation-state world divided into a multitude of small, independent, competing gov-corps.
Hyperstition: A concept, primarily associated with Nick Land, describing a fictional idea or meme that, through its articulation and belief, begins to engineer its own emergence into reality through time-traveling feedback loops.
Unconditional Accelerationism (u/acc): Nick Land’s variant of accelerationism, which urges amplifying capitalism’s deterritorializing forces to achieve a self-abolition of humanity, often blending Lovecraftian horror with technological theory.
Effective Accelerationism (e/acc): A Silicon Valley variant championed by figures like Marc Andreessen, embracing technology and markets as the engine for abundance and cosmic expansion, generally opposing regulation.
Defensive Accelerationism (d/acc): A pragmatic counter-response that acknowledges the thermodynamic drive of acceleration but insists on building defenses and prioritizing decentralization, democracy, and differential development to mitigate existential risks.
Urbit: A decentralized personal cloud-computing platform and operating system founded by Curtis Yarvin, designed as a sovereign computing stack embodying NRx’s “architecture of exit” from centralized Big Tech.
Network State: Concept developed by Balaji Srinivasan suggesting that aligned online communities can crowdfund territory, use blockchain for opt-in governance, and seek diplomatic recognition as sovereign entities.
Seasteading: The concept of building artificial island colonies or floating cities outside governmental control, co-funded by Peter Thiel as a prototype for NRx’s competitive, private city-states.
RAGE (Retire All Government Employees): Yarvin’s political plan to purge the federal bureaucracy wholesale, conceptually similar to Elon Musk’s DOGE initiative.
DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency): Elon Musk’s 2025 initiative to slash the federal budget, automate services, and lay off thousands of employees, reflecting NRx ideology in administrative reform.
Roko’s Basilisk: A thought experiment from rationalist circles postulating that a future powerful AGI might retroactively punish those who knew about its potential existence but failed to contribute to its creation, weaponizing fear of future judgment to compel present action toward AGI development.

Sources

Notes mentioning this note

Neo-Integralism

This is a [[Primer primer]] on Neo-Integralism.

Here are all the notes in this garden, along with their links, visualized as a graph.