Leitbild

This article is part of my Master’s Thesis - Future Imaginaries. Previous Chapter: 3.3.4 Vision

What applies to other terms in this thesis, such as imaginaries and myths, also applies to the concept of the “Leitbild” (guiding principles): there is no uniform, cross-disciplinary definition. Katharina Giesel has examined the many different meanings and their developments and used them to recast the Leitbild approach. For this purpose, she essentially distinguishes between implicit and explicit guiding principles.1

“Implicit models are socially shared, mentally anchored, and internalized patterns of orientation based on ideas of a future that is both desirable and considered feasible. They shape the perceptions, thoughts, and actions of those who share them. They express political future orientation, arouse emotions, and intentionally direct thought and action. They refer to long-term, overarching value or goal concepts or blueprints for the future, with which complex, more or less visually tangible ideas are associated.”2

Thus, implicit Leitbilder share many characteristics with Future Imaginaries, but they have a much more active character concerning desirable futures. Leitbilder are no expectations but ideas about the future that are “considered both desirable and feasible.”2 Although not all actors must always be fully aware of them, they can be formulated and thus become explicit mission statements.3

External Leitbilder emerge from a deliberate process to shape a development. The focus is on bringing together different actors – sometimes from other contexts – with their ideas and bringing these ideas together through the process. External Leitbilder also place a particular emphasis on feasibility. Therefore, they are repeatedly adapted to new research findings or changes to remain achievable.4

In many ways, external Leitbilder are the conceptual counterpart to Future Imaginaries. They attempt to shape future imaginaries that are not yet there or not yet shared among the desired actors. Explicit Leitbilder are meant to be a precursor to implicit Leitbilder. These, in turn, can become Future Imaginaries if they can be sustained and spread until they have moved into the background understanding.

Next Chapter: Megatrend

  1. Giesel, K. D. (2007). Leitbilder in den Sozialwissenschaften: Begriffe, Theorien und Forschungskonzepte (1. Aufl.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. ↩

  2. Translated from ibid., p. 246 ↩ ↩2

  3. ibid., p. 247 ↩

  4. cf. Dignum, M. (2013). The power of large technological visions: the promise of hydrogen energy (1970-2010). ’s-Hertogenbosch: Uitgeverij BOXpress., p. 18 ↩

Notes mentioning this note

Differentiation from similar terms
This article is part of my [[Master’s Thesis - Future Imaginaries]]. Previous Chapter: 3.2.3 [[Roles of future imaginaries]]
Master's Thesis – Future Imaginaries
I did my master’s in futures research from 2017 to 2020 at the FU Berlin. In my master’s thesis, submitted...
Megatrends
This article is part of my [[Master’s Thesis - Future Imaginaries]]. Previous Chapter: 3.3.5 [[Leitbild]]
Towards a definition of Future Imaginaries
This chapter is part of my [[Master’s Thesis - Future Imaginaries]].
Vision
This article is part of my [[Master’s Thesis - Future Imaginaries]]. Previous Chapter: 3.3.3 [[Common sense]]

Here are all the notes in this garden, along with their links, visualized as a graph.

AI and science fictionAI, future imaginaries, and futures studiesArtificial IntelligenceAnti DystopiaApproachDr. Armin GrunwaldArticle - Future FailArticle – Future of Terranascient Futures Studies...Article - Futures from RuinsArticles on FuturesArtificial Intelligence and future imaginariesArticle – Beyond Capitalist RealismThe Blue Ant TrilogyBooks on FuturesCla gameCharacteristics of Future ImaginariesCollective MemoryCommon SenseComparable and related approachesComparison of national AI strategiesComponents of Future ImaginariesConceptual challenges and inconsistenciesConclusionCondensation of Future ImaginariesCritical Futures StudiesCyberpunkDates and eventsDifferentiation from similar termsDigital GardenEarly Approaches to ImaginariesEffect of performativity on future imaginariesFictional Expectations from BeckertFred PolakPaper – From Critique to Cultural RecoveryFuture Imaginaries from CookFuture Imaginaries from Goode and GodheFuture ScenarioFutures StudiesFutures terminologyFuturesGlobal business networkGoalsImages of the Future from InayatullahImaginaries from Lockton and CandyImaginaries from an anthropological perspectiveImaginariesInteresting Questions in Futures Studies &...IntroductionIntroductions to Futures Thinking & ForesightKey questions in critical futures studiesLeitbildLiterature on Critical Futures StudiesLongtermismMaster's Thesis – Future ImaginariesMeaning-Making and AIMegatrendsMetaphorMethodsMinimum group size for (future) imaginariesMythNele fischer on critical futures studiesNo future is neutralNo such thing as “future-proof”Observations from the examination of futures and...Official futureOutlook – Application of future imaginariesOverton WindowPattern recognitionPresent futures from GrunwaldPull of the FutureQuestions for the Start of a Foresight ProjectRationalistsResearch QuestionsRoles of Future ImaginariesSarkar gameSituating the ResearcherSocial ImaginariesSociotechnical Imaginaries from JasanoffSohail InayatullahTescrealThe Difference between Present Futures and Future...Book – The Image of the FutureThe JackpotThe network stateThe Role of Futures in CapitalismThe distinction between imaginaries and future...The vagueness of future imaginariesThinkers on futuresTools for the examination of future imaginariesTowards a definition of Future ImaginariesTraining Practice for FuturistsSorry, but this is not a trend reportVisionWhat good is scientific rigor when nobody gives a...William GibsonMethod: WindtunnelingWorldbuildingCritical FuturesFuture Imaginaries