Components of Future Imaginaries

This article is part of my Master’s Thesis - Future Imaginaries. Previous Chapter: 3.2.1 Characteristics of Future Imaginaries


By bringing together the terms ‘futures’ from futures studies and ‘imaginaries’ from sociology and anthropology, several considerations regarding the components of future imaginaries can be derived.

It can be observed that, especially in the context of imaginaries, there is no uniform description of components but only approximations. Among other things, this might have to do with the location of imaginaries in the background understanding, where imaginaries – as described – largely elude a theory-based consideration.

Considered as images of the future, Future Imaginaries can theoretically consist of the knowledge components and premises listed by Grunwald. They can thus contain present knowledge as a basis on which assessments of future developments within the future image are built. In addition, there are ceteris paribus conditions and ad hoc assumptions.

Here, a certain recursivity of future imaginaries emerges because, first, they are future images themselves, solidifying societal expectations of the future. Then they, in turn, become components of other future images in society. They are incorporated as premises into future images on their respective topic and thus shape the framework of imaginable futures. A possible consequence of this insight would be to add Future Imaginaries to Grunwald’s components of futures and, therefore, consider them deliberately when examining the validity of statements about the future.

However, since they elude direct analysis - as described above - they can only be examined in the form of their manifestation as narratives and actions. Here, the three elements that can be found in imaginaries, according to Patomäki and Steger, are helpful: Prototypes, Metaphors, and Framings (cf. chapter 2.3.2). Examining the images of the future and actions in society on a topic for these elements can provide information about the underlying Future Imaginary.

Also helpful in approaching the components of a Future Imaginary are the three types of knowledge in cultural models cited by Strauss: a prototype, examples, and background understanding or implicit theory (see section 2.3.3).

Based on Strauss, researchers Cantó-Milà and Seebach1 developed a future-related coding approach to analyze autobiographical interviews:

  1. As ‘imaginaries of the future,’ they understand symbolic universes composed of different figures and narratives about the future. These serve as a ‘general framework’ for placing figures and images of the future in the larger context of cultural and social discourses and actions.
  2. As ‘images of the future,’ they identify the concrete images that the interviewees expressed. They refer to their hopes, fears, and other emotions. They describe the what of the individual future imaginary.
  3. Following Marc Augé2, they use the concept of ‘figures’ to describe the how of Future Imaginaries. This involves the form in which respondents present their future imaginaries. The elements mentioned above, such as prototypes, metaphors, and framings, can be linked here.

The conclusion of their consideration makes clear that the described characteristic of Future Imaginaries cannot be captured directly:

“If the figures and images that have been presented are combined together, the contours of the imaginaries of the future can finally be traced.”

They can only be approached by analyzing the manifestations.

Following Lockton and Candy, Future Imaginaries can also be understood as brackets (cf. chapter 2.3.4) that collect different knowledge components and elements such as prototypes, metaphors, and framings.


Next Chapter: 3.2.3 Roles of future imaginaries


  1. Cantó-Milà, N., & Seebach, S. (2015). Desired images, regulating figures, constructed imaginaries: The future as an apriority for society to be possible. Current Sociology, 63(2), 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114556583 

  2. Augé, M. (2004). Oblivion. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 

Notes mentioning this note


Here are all the notes in this garden, along with their links, visualized as a graph.

AI and science fictionAI, future imaginaries, and futures studiesArtificial IntelligenceAnti DystopiaApproachDr. Armin GrunwaldArticle - Future FailArticle – Future of Terranascient Futures Studies...Article - Futures from RuinsArticles on FuturesArtifical general intelligence (agi)Artificial Intelligence and future imaginariesArticle – Beyond Capitalist RealismThe Blue Ant TrilogyBooks on FuturesCla gameCharacteristics of Future ImaginariesCollective MemoryCommon SenseComparable and related approachesComparison of national AI strategiesComponents of Future ImaginariesConceptual challenges and inconsistenciesConclusionCondensation of Future ImaginariesCritical Futures StudiesCyberpunkDates and eventsDifferentiation from similar termsDigital GardenEarly Approaches to ImaginariesEffect of performativity on future imaginariesFictional Expectations from BeckertFred PolakPaper – From Critique to Cultural RecoveryFuture Imaginaries from CookFuture Imaginaries from Goode and GodheFuture ScenarioFutures StudiesFutures terminologyFuturesGlobal business networkGoalsImages of the Future from InayatullahImaginaries from Lockton and CandyImaginaries from an anthropological perspectiveImaginariesInteresting Questions in Futures Studies &...IntroductionIntroductions to Futures Thinking & ForesightKey questions in critical futures studiesLeitbildLiterature on Critical Futures StudiesLongtermismMaster's Thesis – Future ImaginariesMeaning-Making and AIMegatrendsMetaphorMethodsMinimum group size for (future) imaginariesMythNele fischer on critical futures studiesNo future is neutralNo such thing as “future-proof”Observations from the examination of futures and...Official futureOutlook – Application of future imaginariesOverton WindowPattern recognitionPresent futures from GrunwaldPull of the FutureQuestions for the Start of a Foresight ProjectRationalistsResearch QuestionsRoles of Future ImaginariesSarkar gameSituating the ResearcherSocial ImaginariesSociotechnical Imaginaries from JasanoffSohail InayatullahTescrealThe Difference between Present Futures and Future...Book – The Image of the FutureThe JackpotThe network stateThe Role of Futures in CapitalismThe distinction between imaginaries and future...The vagueness of future imaginariesThinkers on futuresTools for the examination of future imaginariesTowards a definition of Future ImaginariesTraining Practice for FuturistsSorry, but this is not a trend reportVisionWhat good is scientific rigor when nobody gives a...William GibsonMethod: WindtunnelingWorldbuildingCritical FuturesFuture Imaginaries