Tescreal

TESCREAL is an acronym coined in 2023 by computer scientist [[ Timnit Gebru ]] and philosopher [[ Émile P. Torres ]] to describe a set of interconnected ideologies prevalent in Silicon Valley and the tech industry1, 2. The term stands for:

T - Transhumanism
E - Extropianism
S - Singularitarianism
C - Cosmism
R - Rationalism
E - Effective Altruism
A - Altruism
L - Longtermism

Core Concepts

TESCREAL encompasses a range of “futuristic” and often controversial beliefs:3

Transhumanism: The idea that humans can and should use technology to enhance their physical and mental capabilities.

Extropianism: A philosophy focused on continuous progress and improvement through technology.

Singularitarianism: The belief that artificial intelligence will eventually surpass human intelligence, leading to a transformative “singularity”.

Cosmism: A belief in the rational nature of the universe and humanity’s potential to understand and shape it.

Rationalism: Emphasizing reason and logic as the primary means of acquiring knowledge.

Effective Altruism: A movement aimed at using evidence and reason to do the most good for the most people.

Longtermism: Prioritizing long-term future outcomes over short-term considerations.

Origins and Influence

The TESCREAL ideologies have roots in 20th-century eugenics and have evolved into what some consider a “third wave” of eugenic thinking1. These ideas have gained significant traction among tech leaders, innovators, and some of the wealthiest individuals in Silicon Valley4.

Criticisms and Concerns

Critics argue that TESCREAL ideologies:

  1. Justify potentially harmful or risky technological pursuits under the guise of averting human extinction.1
  2. Concentrate power in the hands of tech elites.1
  3. Ignore immediate societal issues in favor of speculative future scenarios.5
  4. Have authoritarian implications and are deeply rooted in problematic ideologies.2

Impact on AI Development

TESCREAL thinking has significantly influenced the pursuit of [[ Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) ]] in the tech industry. Proponents often view AGI as a potential solution to humanity’s problems, while simultaneously warning of its existential risks.5

Cultural Significance

The TESCREAL framework has become a lens through which to examine and critique the motivations behind cutting-edge technological developments, particularly in AI4. It has sparked debates about the ethical implications of certain tech pursuits and the long-term vision of influential figures in the industry.

Conclusion

TESCREAL represents a complex and controversial set of ideologies shaping the future of technology and society. As these ideas continue to influence powerful tech leaders and innovators, understanding TESCREAL becomes increasingly important for anyone seeking to comprehend the driving forces behind modern technological development and its potential impacts on humanity’s future.


Citations

Notes mentioning this note


Here are all the notes in this garden, along with their links, visualized as a graph.

AI and science fictionAI, future imaginaries, and futures studiesArtificial IntelligenceAnti DystopiaApproachDr. Armin GrunwaldArticle - Future FailArticle – Future of Terranascient Futures Studies...Article - Futures from RuinsArticles on FuturesArtifical general intelligence (agi)Artificial Intelligence and future imaginariesArticle – Beyond Capitalist RealismThe Blue Ant TrilogyBooks on FuturesCla gameCharacteristics of Future ImaginariesCollective MemoryCommon SenseComparable and related approachesComparison of national AI strategiesComponents of Future ImaginariesConceptual challenges and inconsistenciesConclusionCondensation of Future ImaginariesCritical Futures StudiesCyberpunkDates and eventsDifferentiation from similar termsDigital GardenEarly Approaches to ImaginariesEffect of performativity on future imaginariesFictional Expectations from BeckertFred PolakPaper – From Critique to Cultural RecoveryFuture Imaginaries from CookFuture Imaginaries from Goode and GodheFuture ScenarioFutures StudiesFutures terminologyFuturesGlobal business networkGoalsImages of the Future from InayatullahImaginaries from Lockton and CandyImaginaries from an anthropological perspectiveImaginariesInteresting Questions in Futures Studies &...IntroductionIntroductions to Futures Thinking & ForesightKey questions in critical futures studiesLeitbildLiterature on Critical Futures StudiesLongtermismMaster's Thesis – Future ImaginariesMeaning-Making and AIMegatrendsMetaphorMethodsMinimum group size for (future) imaginariesMythNele fischer on critical futures studiesNo future is neutralNo such thing as “future-proof”Observations from the examination of futures and...Official futureOutlook – Application of future imaginariesOverton WindowPattern recognitionPresent futures from GrunwaldPull of the FutureQuestions for the Start of a Foresight ProjectRationalistsResearch QuestionsRoles of Future ImaginariesSarkar gameSituating the ResearcherSocial ImaginariesSociotechnical Imaginaries from JasanoffSohail InayatullahTescrealThe Difference between Present Futures and Future...Book – The Image of the FutureThe JackpotThe network stateThe Role of Futures in CapitalismThe distinction between imaginaries and future...The vagueness of future imaginariesThinkers on futuresTools for the examination of future imaginariesTowards a definition of Future ImaginariesTraining Practice for FuturistsSorry, but this is not a trend reportVisionWhat good is scientific rigor when nobody gives a...William GibsonMethod: WindtunnelingWorldbuildingCritical FuturesFuture Imaginaries